Showing posts with label WTF?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WTF?. Show all posts

Bloop

Main article: Bloop


Ever been really bored? Like so F-ing bored you spend long moments with your service revolver in your mouth contemplating the relative entertainment value to be found in your own oblivion? Well, Wikipedia has got your back. No, not on offing yourself (although if you do that spectacularly enough you can totally count on getting your own article) rather, keeping you amused with strange, cryptic articles.

Now, don’t get me wrong. Not every short, cryptic article is very fun, despite their fun titles (see poothole for example). Still, with a little looking, some sweet gems turn up. One of the finest, in this author's humble opinion, comes from the frightening underworld lurking deep within cold, remote seas. It’s a mystery sound, known as the “Bloop”. The name being a bit of an onomatopoeia that, while fairly ambiguous, sounds better then “gassy baby in bathwater”.

Why is this sound so awesome? Well, out of context, it really isn’t. It sounds like, uh, a bloop. It’s only when you consider that the sound’s profile fits something “animal in origin” and its many times more powerful then the loudest animal sound in the world, can you really appreciate the mental images of giant kraken or monstrous eels that spring to mind.

This is one artist's rendition of what may be responsible for the "bloop"
and his rather negative appearing interaction with santa.

Personally, I acoustically like the slow down even better, as it sounds creeper to me, (or maybe just like a jet landing) leaving your imagination to paint the picture of some giant demon clawing his way to the earth's surface. If you find all these sounds fascinating, hit the “list of unexplained sounds” article to really get the most from your evening.

Truthfully though, this article brings up a bit of an auxiliary issue. We’re trusting scientists that this sound is really as magical as they say it is. I don’t know about you, but part of me thinks someone at NOAA is playing a little joke on us.

I mean, we all remember the moon landing conspiracy, right? Well I guess a lot of readers, and myself, don't actually remember the moon landing, but countless textbooks of told us of the hilarity that ensued when NASA pranked both the Russians and the American people. Obvious, the hippies at NOAA aren’t going to have that same kind of budget, but whose to say that NOAA wouldn’t do something on a much more small scale?

Look, all I’m saying is we need to be careful here. Otherwise we could end up buying into another "well to hell" recording, and no one wants that. :P

Just going by the sounds shown, hell is about as harrowing as a rollercoaster. :\

Handkerchief code

Main article: Handkerchief code

Like an effeminate touch applied to histories supple backside, homosexuality has had a long and “pride” filled existence.

As many readers are aware, the ancient Greeks were the first to invent gay sex (Hence the phrase “going Greek” or "Greek love"), although they eventually apologized for this and later made up for it by inventing things like democracyplumbing, and the Archimedes screw (no relation to gay sex). Over the next few millennia, starting in the Mediterranean, homosexuality slowly arose it’s fat, cobra-like head, and spread across the rest of the world. This lasted until well into the 20th-century when it finally took up permanent residence in San Francisco, which then officially ceded from the straight world sometime in the 1970’s.

There are some in recent years however, who have sought to challenge the notion that the Greeks invented anything more then a crude vernacular referring to anal sex for escort service ads. Many point to the ubiquitous nature of homosexuality in, well, nature. As the Wikipedia article Homosexuality in animals attests, sex between male giraffes happens to such an uncomfortable degree that conservationists, like parents of recently outed children, don’t know whether to be supportive or ashamed.

Bad giraffe! You keep up this deviant behavior and the
Kansas city zoo is going to create a giraffe straight camp!

Still, the road to the current state of gay liberation has not been without a few hiccups. There was that whole awkward thing of being written out most major religions. Also, being rounded up and exterminated during the holocaust wasn’t too hot either.

...Well, maybe that’s a poor word choice.

While the road has certainly been a rocky one, from this adversity much innovation has been born. Admittedly, not all of it has been completely perfect. For example, there was Gay fuel, a now-defunct gay energy drink. While generally described as having a good taste, it came with the unfortunate side effect of turning one flamboyantly homosexual for roughly 4-6 hours following consumption.

Here's a fun idea: pack one of these into your kids school
lunch and see how many bruises they come home with.

Yet many creations were nothing less then remarkable. One such invention, which certainly left homosexuals coming out on top...er, so to speak, is what’s known as handkerchief code.

As its Wikipedia article attests, this brilliant system was devised to allow members of small sexual minorities, homosexuals and beyond, to find each other by wearing specific colors of handkerchief; the “giver” generally wearing it in their left trouser pocket (Yes, I said trouser), and the “receiver” in their right. The system is analogous to the color matching jerseys seen on sports teams, only way gayer.

As one would expect, the article bares a substantial list of all the divergent colors and their typical meanings. Far more freaky practices then perhaps then most readers will have even realized existed. While most are rather ho-hum, such as anal intercourse, daddy/boy sex, and cock-and-ball torture, a few have the potential to stir a readers casual interest, such as the “dark red” color and its reference to the nostalgic pastime of two-handed anal fisting.
Who wants a mustache ride??

The system, while admirable, is not without it’s slight defects. Despite their proclivity for interior design and fashion, a few homosexuals still can’t tell the difference between similar colors, such as “Kelly green” and “Hunter green” (something which no straight man can determine). These minor snafus can occasionally lead to some hurt feelings in situations where one persons desire for spanking, for example, tragically ends in a two-handed anal fisting.

That said, as an oblivious straight man myself, I have to tip my hat to the exotic world of homosexuality and fetishes, for they have engineered a system far superior to those used by their straight counterparts. Handkerchief code gives me the orientation equivalent of penis-envy. Why can’t the boring, mainstream, straight world come up with a great system like this? Granted, our engagement/wedding ring system has worked pretty well with vanilla sex for centuries now, but perhaps it’s time that we aspired for more. Why can’t I wear an excessively large flesh-tone colored hat to show that I would prefer a woman with excessively large flesh-tone colored breasts? And women, why not wear something distinctive, like diamond encrusted tiara to signify you’re looking for a guy with money, so that more economically disadvantaged males can steer clear. Yes, there is much progress to be made here, and embarrassingly, it’s those having sex in furry costumes that are leading the way.

This would symbolize that you do not 
want to have sex with this woman. 

Awesomeness tip: Check out the Handkerchief code article. If you’re like me, and you’d like to commandeer this system for your own, much like your ancestors probably did to Indian lands, look through the list and carefully determine what fetish might be right for you. When you think you know, go to a website like http://www.handkerchiefsofcolor.com/ and order that particularly color of hanky. Wear it for a few weeks and see what results you get. If enough straight people do this, eventually homosexuals will realize how lame the practice has become and abandon it. Until such time, you might be occasionally surprised by a large, hairy man in a leather gimp suit grabbing your ass, but these are the temporary prices we must pay to help carve a better future!



I’ve got a gold colored hanky heading for my left pocket today! :D

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Main article: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Does the word “homonym” sound dirty to you? What about “homophone”? Does it sound like a gayer version of Homer Simpson’s timeless “Sax-a-ma-phone”? Those terms, included numerous times in article’s title, are simply but a taste of the complexity that is the English language.

We can all learn a lot from this man.

While the title of today’s article might sound nothing more then the redundant use of the name for a large, shaggy bovid, truthfully, it’s quite possibly the most confusing valid sentence in the English language. Yes, it’s true. It technically would have been an acceptable response to your English teachers request for a example sentence, while simultaneously earning you many disgusted looks from the more popular kids.

Now that you know it’s a sentence and it’s legit, you probably aren’t very surprised to hear that this isn’t a complete anomaly either, the articles “See also” section bares many similar such confusanyms, such as:

James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

Colorless green ideas sleep furiously? WTF? Obviously this revelation has rendered everything you’ve learned in K-8 now in void. Your welcome.

But before I release thee to relearn your native language, let’s take a quick moment to address how crap like this happens.

To begin with, English is a lil' crazy. It can be difficult to see this as a primary speaker, but remember that you’ve likely taken a lifetime to adapt yourself to the cadre of verb tenses, numerous exceptions to pluralize nouns (for example, words that change interior vowel sounds, like “mouse/mice”) and a vast number of irregular verbs, many of which become substantially altered in conjugation. Since none of these issues are in any way funny, we’ll just casually gloss over them.

On a more entertaining note, many linguists conjecture that the complexity of the English language is, for the most part, a premeditated scheme used by the Illuminati and other various secret societies to repress the poorly-educated and immigrants in order to further alienate them and keep them from unduly affecting the electorate.

Nothing is as funny as repression, right?

One of the very few languages that English has any substantial relation to is the Scots language, which, since few readers have likely heard any spoken, is about as intelligible as a drunk and pissed-off Scotsman yelling at you in heavily-accented Scottish English.

And you wonder why people say shit like “irregardless”...

With these issues in mind, may I humbly suggest a few alternatives that might make English a whole lot easier on everyone:

Alternative #1: Revert modern English back to middle, or even Old English (no relation to the forty). Back in ye olde tymes, people were lucky just to be literate, let alone know anything about punctuation, thus English was a lot simpler. The following is a KFC drive-through menu in Old English:

"Ic nam me to gemynde þa gewritu and þa word, þe se arcebiscop Lyfing me fram þam papan brohte of Rome, þæt ic scolde æghwær godes lof upp aræran and unriht alecgan and full frið wyrcean be ðære mihte, þe me god syllan wolde."

Alternative #2: Ok, so maybe words like "æghwær" and "ðære" are a bit much for most of us. Why not try pure phonetics? Consider the following sentence. What it lacks in ascetics, it more then makes up in pronounceablity:

/ðə/ /ˈresɪpi / /fɔ:r/ /ðə/ /ˈtʃɪkɪn/ /ɪz/ /ɪn/ /ðə/ /ˈkɪtʃɪn/

See, easy!

Alternative #3: Want something ever so slightly more established? Try Ebonics. Since it directly derives from modern English there should be some amount of mutual intelligibility already. Does someone think you made a grammatical mistake? Just coin it as a new piece of slang. You’re not retarded, you're just hip. Don’t believe it’s that easy? The next time you see a gansta, ask him what the difference is between a comma and a semi-colon. You’ll quickly discover how much he cares. Maybe even with a cap in that azz.

This is your new language teacher, C-Dogg. You will notice that he likely has some familiarity with Olde English.

One final note: Many years ago, while teaching martial arts in a middle school and regaling the lads with my multi-linguistic command over kicking and punching terms, one of the students mentioned that he too spoke another language. When I inquired further, the imp informed me that he spoke “human”. Had I the patience then that I do now, rather then threatening this affable scamp with the back of my hand, I could have explored this apparently universal language further and perhaps even discovered a solution for many of societies woes. I guess I'll never know now...

I guess I'll leave saving the children to famous people...

Popobawa

Main article: Popobawa

HOLY JEBUS, where do I start with this F’d up article?

Ok...well...imagine if you will, some form of utopia. Let’s say, for example, some mythical, androgynous kingdom of elves, playing their questionable little flutes and living high in some canopy village on a distant, nearly unreachable land.

[insert warm, fuzzy feeling]

Now, we all know that every fiction story needs a narrative conflict or it’s not really much of a story, right? In the case of elves, conflict generally arises in the form of some darker, far less attractive adversary ceaselessly crashing upon their emerald shores, trying to raze their harmonious little world for no seemingly logical reason (although that does sound pretty fun...little elven bastards...).

Anyway, returning to reality, Wikipedia is that magical utopia. Everyday countless numbers of loathsome, fiendish articles all try to penetrate her silicon chastity belt of encyclopedic excellence. Each is looking for the established credibility that being a Wikipedia article brings, which is obviously absolute and unquestionable authority on the subject.

How bad can this problem really be, you ask? Why can't Wikipedia stop being such an icy, perfectionistic bitch like that girl that wouldn't date you in high school and just accept you for the awkward individual you are? Well, assuming I’m able to overlook your blatant wikiblasphemy, I would suggest you check out the creepy article underworld known as Deletionpedia. You see, just like in religon and fairytails, articles have afterlives too. Deletionpedia is where bad articles go when they die. There they stay for eternity, never to return...

...Well, except in the cases when notability is established months or years later and they actually do come back. So I guess, to extend the metaphor, that would be like when Jesus was resurrected from hell on the 7th day or whatever.

So anyway, take just a moment and picture yourself as a Wikipedia soldier drone, on patrol, keyboard locked and loaded, and coming across this freshly created article:

Popobawa is a Bat like Sexual Creature that resembles the creature from Jeepers Creepers terrorising people in Tanzania. Popobawa has been known to strike in Zanzibar and Dar-es-salaam. He Sodomises men and the rules state that if a victim does not tell people, Popobawa will keep on sodomising him until he does so. This creature can also be compared to a Chupacabra from latin america with slight differences, thus Popobawa does not seem to harm people or animals and he has wings. Popobawa is purely a sexual Demon. In the late 1990's to 2000'2 Popobawa ran rampant in Coastal Tanzania, such that in some instances people (especially men) were seen sleeping outside with fears of being sodomised. So far there are no known reports of Popobawa attacking Women.

Riiiiiiight...

Now, I don’t know about you, but this whole thing comes off to me as a completely bat-shit crazy story written by some bi-curious teenager. DELETE...DELETEDELETEDELETEDELETEDELETE.

But wait a sec...

hold on...

...turns out that the Popobawa is...real?

That’s right, you heard me, REAL.

I mean, not like scholarly zoological real, or even really crackpot cryptozoology real, more like a shadow people real. But with hundreds, if not thousands now, of people claiming to have been sodomized in the dead of the night by a marauding bat-demon, it’s real enough to keep me from wanting to travel to Tanzania.

Remember universal law #27? That things were usually more hardcore in the 1940’s? Well rule #28 is more temporally current and geographically based version of that:

Universal law #28: Things are generally more hardcore in Africa.

Look, I don’t even have to get into touchy stuff like ebola21st-century genocides, and frequent, catastrophic famine; just look at the animals. Lions, hyenas, even the damn bees. "Africanized" honeybees are better known as "killer bees" because they're so badass. And it's this "Africanized" effect that obviously transfers over to less tangable entities too. For example, we have the reclusive, yet lovable, bigfoot, who misbehaves by raiding your camp site. Africa, in turn, has the Popobawa, who raids the very essence of your being...repeatedly.

Non-africanized Killer Bees. Note how much less letal they appear.

Keep in mind that rule #28 isn't a racial or even cultural thing, although the African people themselves are undoubtedly resilient given their residency in Africa. I have no doubt that my pasty white ass would have quickly become lion chow had I chosen the alternative career path of subsistence farmer.


Awesomeness tip: The Popobawa article has been substantially cleaned up since his freewheelin’, overly-sexualized ways, but you can still see some of the craziness in the titles of his source articles. Make sure to check out the wikilinks in the “See also” section to read up on similar preternatural rapists. You know, if you’re into that sort of thing. :\

Mystery of the Somerton Man

Main article: The Somerton Man (Also known as the "Taman Shud Case")

Ever wanted to mystify an entire nation with every essence of your untimely demise? What about just disappear off the grid? Well, there probably wasn’t much of a “grid” back in the 1940’s (Unless asking the switchboard lady to kindly connect you to Mabel down the street counts), but either way, if you were half as smooth as the Somerset man or his killers, you could probably do both.

Best. Unsolved murder/suicide/man-death mystery. Ever.

Why? Because it’s so over-the-top that if it were a plot, it’d be cheesy. But that’s the best part; it’s all factual.

Now, I know what you’re thinking. This is gunna be like some Nancy Drew or Hardy boys book. A little foreshadowing and you’ll have yourself a pretty good idea of what happened. Well forget that shit. The Somerset man is the Chinese finger trap of mysteries. Check it:
  • Mysterious identity
  • Mysterious cause of death
  • Mysterious witnesses
  • Mysterious secret, seemingly unbreakable codes? WTF??
Same mystery, significantly less homoeroticism.

Universal law #27: Turns out that most things were more hardcore in the 1940’s. This is why hat-man wears a fedora. This mystery comes from the 1940’s so keep that in mind.

Awesomeness tip: This is a pretty long and (hopefully) engrossing article. You should probably only start reading it if you have more then 5 minutes to kill.