Showing posts with label Awesome people. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Awesome people. Show all posts

Marlboro Man


Main article: Marlboro Man

Not gunna lie, as a wee child I smoked candy cigarettes. Yea, I’ll admit it. I would go buy them at the convenience store for like a quarter or some amount of coinage that no longer has any value, and then go out to the corner of the field and pretend to smoke them with a buddy or two. Apparently, being able to see my breath on those frosty winter mornings helped complete the strange role-play (oddly enough, no recess-monitoring adults ever seemed to care that we were a bunch of grade schoolers who appeared to be smoking cigarettes, leading me to believe that we must have been really bad at pulling it off. Oh, that and the fact that we inevitably ATE them. That might have also tipped them off…)

We used to trade them for commisary and shanks too

Now, were you to ask any concerned adult about our behavior, I’m sure they would almost guarantee that we were all destined to become haggard, chain-smoking adults. We young impressionable children, the appeal would have obviously been to great for any of us to fight. But the anti-smoking crusaders never counted on one important fact: Cigarettes smell (and likely taste) like ass. If cigarettes WERE like candy cigarettes, I’d have as many holes in my lungs as I do teeth (thank you dental insurance!). :D

Me on the far left, circa 1935

At any rate, a couple decades have gone by and now papabear nostalgically wants himself some candy cigarettes. Why? BECAUSE I CAN’T FIND THEM ANYMORE. Now, I know they are still out there; I could buy them off the internet if I REALLY wanted too. But I don’t. I want them in convenience stores again for no apparent reason. I’m not even sure they tasted very good, but I want to be able to buy them.

This brings up an interesting question though. What the hell happened to smoking culture anyway? I can only speak for a few limited parts of the US, but it would seem that much of western culture has tried to rid itself of every mention of cigarettes. Pondering on this, I couldn’t help but wonder what happened to the one rugged, lonesome ranger, who represented all things smoking: the Kool-Aid Man…er, I mean the Marlboro Man. For no one embodies smoking as well as he. (Ok, maybe Joe Camel).

How much more frighteningly effective would cigarette advertising be with this guy?

So what ever happened to the Marlboro man anyway? I bet you think he died, don’t you? Don’t lie! Well you’re dead wrong. He died multiple times, as Marlboro Man was akin to TV’s Lassie, who was played by a succession of collies. You see, each time your child’s Marlboro Man dies, you can appearently just go down to the cowboy pound and let them pick out a new one. (Unlike cats and dogs, where the young ones get adopted and the old ones just get euthanized, old, leathery cowboys are actually preferable to young hot ones, unless you happen to have a teenage cowgirl, but in that case you’ll want to make sure you get your Marlboro man neutered). This should also answer for you the annoying question as to where have all the cowboys have gone.

Don't EVER try to get an old Marlboro Man to quit smoking...

Now, admittedly, maybe actually smoking really is a bad thing, and these days the only people I know who smoke are miscellaneous hipsters and a few old crusty broads that work in my office, but importantly, smoking once told you who was a badass in popular culture. It made it easier for writers to show you who could be cool, hard, and edgy without having to put in scenes that are unrelated to the plot, and just show annoying character development.

What we really need is more smoking. Not necessarily in life, but in media. Will this make some very impressionable people start smoking? Maybe, but those people are just as likely to die in an okie noodlin event as anything else. We need those cigarettes to help us instantly determine the character of fictional characters. Otherwise we're going to have to rely on toothpicks! :O 

Seriously?

The execution of Private Slovik

Main article: Eddie Slovik

Many of us hope to leave behind some sort of legacy after we’re gone. For a lucky few, this means accomplishing things in life so heroic (or infamous, you know, whatever) that volumes will be written about us, movies made, and future generations left to talk about where they were when we momentarily imperiled a baby.

Sadly, most of us will never achieve that level of greatness. For many, becoming a historical footnote becomes our only bronze, or even occasional silver medal of fame. And if any man were said to have achieved this notability runners-up prize in 1944, it would be Army Private Eddie Slovik. In that year he became the first man since the civil war to be executed by the United States Military for being stupid.

Yes, yes, I’ll admit, there was perhaps a smidge of bad luck on Eddie’s part. He was thoroughly made an example of, and certainly suffered from more then a little naivety. Eddie foolishly attempted to engage his superiors, earnestly trying to appeal to their sense of mercy and emotion (something which we all know that great men don’t have, especially in a time of war). He tried to convince them to rise above their blind, almost mechanical adherence to the law, and in the end, Eddie got himself shot….quite a few times, I might add.

Read his story well, as it should send an icy warning down your spine whenever you next find yourself standing at a vexing juncture, debating between actually doing something wrong, or seeking help to prevent you from for doing something wrong, as, apparently, only an idiot like Eddie would do.

This rare picture of Eddie in uniform is
required to accompany any mention of him.

Every recounting of Eddie’s star-crossed tale always starts from well before the war, in his youth. By all accounts, Eddie was a bit of a troublemaker. At the age of 12, he and some friends anachronistically broke into a foundry and stole some metal, generations before countless meth addicts would make that crime into a thriving industry.

And it didn’t end there. Years later he was arrested for selling bootleg DVD’s, more then 50 years before anyone would possess the technology to watch them.

Note: The modern reader should strive to keep this analysis in proper perspective however, as even the worst 1940’s delinquent is pathetically innocent when compared to today’s average, facially-tattooed, Satan-worshiping, public school student.

Say hello to your daughter's prom date. Don't worry; he's working toward becoming a mortician.

As he got older, Eddie was able to enjoy many of the perks that came with being a convicted felon. One of which was being classified as “unfit” to serve or even be drafted into the military. This is a pretty big deal when the world is over-indulging on the delectable parfait known as WWII, the single deadliest conflict in human history (it comes topped with a couple maraschino cherries of nuclear weapons used against civilian populations). As humanity performed unconscionable atrocities upon itself, many of which are still seared into our collective nightmares, Eddie was working for a plumber in Wisconsin (boooooring).

But, like so many fun moments of slipping through the cracks, it wasn’t bound to last. The army eventually discovered that many criminals are actually pretty good at killing people and began to change their policies. In late 1943 Eddie was one of those effected, and he became officially re-classified as “the cat’s pajamas”, which, in 1940’s slang, means acceptable infantryman.

This piece of pictorial propaganda was photoshopped by the Nazis 
in an attempt to show American servicemen as "caring" and "humane",
thus demoralizing them. As professional killing machines, soldiers never hug.

When Eddie finally made it to his unit he made the prudent, if not completely pansy decision that the inside of a cell was preferable to the outside world of mortal combat. After all, he had spent a significant chunk of his life behind bars already. [Let me just interject here and say that as a youth who grew up playing Wolfenstein 3D and other various, fictional, pixilated accounts of WWII battlefields, Eddie’s decision not to single-handedly save anonymous villages from Nazi occupation or perform other feats of heroics that all WWII infantrymen were obviously capable of leaves me greatly disappointed in him.]

In passing up the front lines, Eddie forever gave up his chance to assassinate
a crazed, double chain-gun wielding Hitler.

At first, Eddie told his captain that he was “too scared” to serve in a rifle company and asked to be assigned to a rear unit. The captain, knowing that grueling combat against the Nazis would help Eddie build character and look good on his post-war resume, denied his request and sent him to a rifle company like the dick he was.

The next day, when Eddie actually found and joined up with his rifle company…well, I’m no soldier, but let’s just say that writing a note telling the army that you're planning on deserting is a lot like writing some guy a note telling him that you're planning on banging his wife. In very few situations is that a good idea. Yet that’s exactly what Eddie did next. Few people would have guessed that he’d be so ballsy at proclaiming his unballsyness.

Eddie was given several opportunities to shred his note and go back to dying out in some forest somewhere, but he declined each time. He even went so far as to write a second note onto the back of the first one when asked to, stating that he knew what kind of shit he was getting into. Going back to my earlier analogy, that’s like taking the note you wrote to that dude saying you were going to bang his wife, and then writing a second note on the back of it saying, “no, seriously, I’m going to bang the shit out of your wife.”

Needless to say, Eddie was quickly court marshaled and sentenced to death. The court declined to note the irony behind this outcome on the record.

Not surprisingly, this wasn’t exactly the result Eddie was hoping for. He appealed, even going so far as to write Dwight Eisenhower, supreme commander of the European front and future president, asking for clemency. Eisenhower, facing rising numbers of desertion and some of the toughest fighting of the war, formally responded with “Meh”, sealing Eddie’s fate.

As tragic as this was, what's even worse is that this scene
 inspired 2006's uber-annoying "Had a bad day" song.

Later, after the sentence had been carried out, some officers felt disbelief over what happened. Colonel Guy Williams (not the 60’s fashion model) a member of the court martial board that convicted Eddie said that he didn’t think “a single member of that court actually believed that Slovik would ever be shot. I know I didn’t believe it.”

He later went on to say “I thought it was going to be one of those surprise birthday things. You know, we tie him up, blindfold him, have him say a few last words and then BAM, we hit him in the face with some cake like those timely and hilariously cutting-edge Three Stooges.” Then, the officer extinguished his cigarette on the face of a dead German and just for shits went out and single-handedly saved a small village from the Nazi advance.

Did you know? In 1944, it took less time to issue and carry out a death 
sentence then it does to get a modern parking ticket adjudicated?

As you can imagine, many of Eddie’s fellow rank-and-file soldiers that ended up fighting and dying in his place also took sympathy on him. One of his firing squad executioners was quoted saying:
“I got no sympathy for that sonofabitch! He deserted us, didn’t he? He didn’t give a damn how many of us of us got the hell shot out of us, why should we care for him?”
Touche’ sir, touche’, but how many Nazis have you killed with your bare hands? Only 12? Well then you obviously have little room to talk...

Anyway, I think we’ve all learned something here today. First, don’t ever threaten to do something wrong and ask for clemency as that just tells people you’re probably a pussy. Better to actually be a pussy and run away to begin with. Secondly, and as I’m sure you’ll agree more importantly, don’t ever piss off former president Eisenhower, especially if he comes back from the dead and becomes supreme commander of an undead army (As “supreme commander” is the appropriate title for a leader of an undead army).

On second thought, just try not pissing off anyone named Dwight, as they tend to be a little hardcore.

Nice guy verses Bad boy

Main article: Nice guy verses bad boy
  • Do you put the needs of others before your own?
  • Do you freely give emotional support?
  • Do you sometimes weep softly at the end of romantic comedies?
If you answered yes to any of the above and you’re a male, you might be afflicted with what’s known as “nice guy syndrome”. Don’t be ashamed. You really shouldn’t beat yourself up over it, as your “nice” traits make it likely that you will. Just realize that while pro-social behavior is generally a indicator of success in nearly all modern endeavors, it does come with a price, a very steep price I might add. A price you will pay by rarely getting laid.

How can I say this with a jerk-like confidence? Because so sayeth the divine word of Wikipedia in the article “Nice guy”.

You see, when it comes to males, we can all be casually sorted into two diametrically opposing personas, with absolutely no room for any crossover. Either a guy thinks that turtlenecks are “cozy” and finds chaperones on dates as acceptable, if not a necessity, or he’s a master of administering the “purple-nurple” to weaker males and finds domestic violence “funny”.



Nice guy/bad boy test question #1:  Does the prospect of Venom devouring this helpless child amuse or horrify you?

I’d like to pause at this point and take a page out of the nice guy handbook by apologizing to the female readers, as this article, and being a “nice guy” in general, really only applies to males. As we all know, women have no nice guy equivalent. Rather, every woman, with her extra, DNA-laden, X chromosome, is capable of a mind-boggling assortment of behavior, shifting from benevolent angel one moment to raging she-demon the next, all dependent upon a mere 713 influencing factors, such as mood, hormones, the phases of the moon, coin-toss, etc.

What we can now say with certainty however, is that women do not want to have sex with men that are respectful and emotionally available. What do you mean “How would I know”? I already told you BITCH! (You should be finding me slightly more attractive now).

Nice guy/bad boy test question #2: Is Jesus a badass in this
picture because he's Jesus or because he's wielding a rifle?

The nice guy article isn’t really awesome for what it contains as much as what it means for men. First, it further traumatizes an already fragile and sensitive demographic of men who have likely known for quite a while now that they have significant problems courting women*, but more importantly it rationalizes all male bad behavior with the implicit promise that it’ll get us more sex. As a male, few things could be any more encouraging and liberating.

*Admittedly, this is somewhat funny.

So what’s the prognosis of someone suffering from nice guy syndrome? Well, it’s mixed. You can choose to remain a nice guy, and end up living a mediocre life that could best be described with words like “contentment”, “longevity”, and “blessed”, or you could learn to channel the badass, and, while likely never achieving any measure of true happiness and probably dying an early, prank-related death, have a lot more fun and, as I believe I’ve mentioned a number of times earlier, have more sex. Statistically, 97.3% of men will quickly choose the latter option. Thus, your prescription will need to be a massive dosage of male enhancement, and not the kind that makes your junk bigger.

Nice guy/bad boy test question #3: Too hardcore or not too hardcore enough? 

So just who is this metaphorical cyborg-pirate-ninja-jesus? He’s the bad boy. He dispensed you that beating in middle school and, in case you've forgotten already, he has a lot more sex then you. Some men that are truly fortunate are born with one or more fun personality quirks from what is known as the “dark triad”, comprising narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. It’s called the dark triad in honor of the badass ninja gang, from whence, as we all know, the real cyborg-pirate-ninja-jesus came.

So as you can see, the solution is a simple one. You need to start being more of a hardass and it’s not going to be easy. Unlike bad boys, facades and deception are not something you’ll have had much previous experience with. But with practice you should be able to erode most of what it took your parents and society so long to teach you.

Nice guy/bad boy test question #4: What if Rick James really had become the Hulk?

Considering putting down the toilet seat? Don’t! You’re a badass now. Your woman wants you to clean your shit out of the garage today? You’d be better off spending that time removing the sleeves from all your shirts and buying an eye-patch. As a badass, you follow nobody's rules, not even your own probably. (also, that eye-patch will come in handy at covering up the bruises from when she gets home and finds out you did not clean your shit out of the garage like you were supposed to).

Awesomeness test answers:
  • Question #1: Horrify = 0, Amuse = 1, I would love to see the before and after pictures = 2
  • Question #2: Jesus = 0, Rifle = 1, Neither, that picture is boring = 2
  • Question #3: Hardcore = 0, Not hardcore enough = 1, That's my facebook profile picture = 2
  • Question #4: Angry black people scare me = 0, Awesome! = 1, Rick James isn't the Hulk? = 2
If you scored 3 or less: You're a "nice guy". First things first, stop tying your damn sweater around your waist!
If you scored 4 - 6: You're a mild "bad boy", or at least you front one well. Don't let anyone find out you still like spooning.
If you scored 7 or more: You're true badass! Why are you reading a blog page? Shouldn't you be out causing hooliganism?

Seduction community

Main article: Seduction community

Science; from its humble beginnings as a Dungeons & Dragons club formed in the basement of Socreates' parents house, to the near countless specialized fields that we know today (including astronomy, geology, and scatology, to name a but a few), science has truly budded into a beautiful young lady. And by young lady, I mean a systematic and empirical based method of discovery.

But this was by no means an overnight process. Baby science grew slowly, and, upon contracting the occasional childhood dark age or infectious book burning, even took a few steps back at times. Scientists of bygone ages were often faced with exile, excommunication, and ex-livingness. (Today’s scientists, by contrast, generally only face ex-spouses). Yes, it was a far cry from our enlightened age where a career in science can easily turn the most gangly and socially awkward into an international sex symbol.

Case in point: the former computer scientist Bill Gates.  
Consistently ranked as one of People Magazine's 100 most beautiful people.
Here he is pretending to be a pirate while drawing some of his fans an invisible treasure map.

So it’s not often that I’m privileged enough to introduce an entirely new field of science in this advanced age of ours, but that’s exactly what this week's article brings. The seduction community: a loose-knit group of enterprising males who practice what could best be described as seductionology, formally defined as the science of banging hot chicks.

While this might not sound like much of a science, and, admittedly, is horribly underrepresented at science fairs, it’s importance cannot be questioned, for it allows wholly unremarkable men to have a shot at bedding women well above them in terms of physical appearance and social status. The community accomplishes this goal by not only teaching men the half science/art/magic of learning how to get women to actually tolerate talking to them, but even addresses the holy grail of seductionology: the ability to get anyone to sleep with you. Even dudes.

No, just kidding, that’d be pretty gay.

So who are these valiant Don Juan's? Those more or less able to implement the techniques honed in the seduction community are known as "pickup artists". While the title might make them sound like anything but scientists, these daring Casanovas are more like the natural philosophers of old, who knew science as much of an art as anything else. But to call them scientists or even artists would be unfair, for as members of the seduction community, they exist in what are called “lairs” (seriously), making them obviously more like superheroes, or I guess supervillains, depending on how you look at it.

This is "Mystery", level 87 nymphomancer and the Copernicus of the seduction community. 
He only dresses like a douchebag because he likes the added challenge.

Their superpowers: To get you to find them the most fascinating person on the planet.
Your resistance: Futile.

With the above in mind, it’s little wonder that some people, mostly the seduction communities arch-nemesis, the feminists, find these delightful characters more then a little threatening. Some of the words used in the article to describe men in the seduction community are “sinister”, “pathetic” and that they “sometimes [treat women] as a commodity”.

Now, I suppose I could see how devising a covert strategy to underhandedly earn someone’s affections for your own sexual gratification might be slightly sinister, or how studying special techniques and logging “field reports” to accomplish something that superior men can do unconsciously could be seen as mildly pathetic, but one thing is for sure, no one should think of women as commodities.

Women are (unfortunately) not sold by the bushel. And no matter how convenient it may be, you cannot store Costco-sized pallets of women in your warehouse until you're ready to use them. No, women are not commodities, but more like more complex financial instruments, such as derivatives, or stock options. And as we all know, piss one off enough and she’ll quickly bring down more then just your flawed banking regulatory system.

 The one exception to the rule however are cheerleaders, who are
not only a commodity but also make acceptable carry-on items.

Awesomeness tip: My hat goes off to the seduction community, certainly what they do as a hobby can’t be any lamer then reviewing Wikipedia articles. The whole subculture is fascinating and I implore you to read the article. Just to sweeten the deal, I’ll throw in a related, unlinked article called Concepts in the seduction community and a review just a few of its contents to help prove that I’m not just making all this up. The following are real phrases used in the community:

Bitch shield— a dysphemistic term used to describe the reaction of many females who are accustomed to being approached frequently. While threatening, the bitch shield is substantially less painful then the bitch sword and much less traumatic then the bitch photon torpedo. Also, if seduction attempts go badly enough, the bitch shield can turn into the bitch slap.

Cockblock— While this, originally a seduction community term, has found its way in mainstream society, few know that rather then just part of a crude parlance describing the act blocking someones seduction attempts, the technique is simply named after its inventor, Chesterfield J. Cockblock.

Neg— The neg is an ambiguous or negative statement used to generate a reaction in a women. While tricky to use, a well placed neg can do wonders in getting an initial opening going. An example of this would be “Nice nails; are they real?” or my personal favorite, “JESUS, what’s wrong with your face?”

Mystery of the Somerton Man

Main article: The Somerton Man (Also known as the "Taman Shud Case")

Ever wanted to mystify an entire nation with every essence of your untimely demise? What about just disappear off the grid? Well, there probably wasn’t much of a “grid” back in the 1940’s (Unless asking the switchboard lady to kindly connect you to Mabel down the street counts), but either way, if you were half as smooth as the Somerset man or his killers, you could probably do both.

Best. Unsolved murder/suicide/man-death mystery. Ever.

Why? Because it’s so over-the-top that if it were a plot, it’d be cheesy. But that’s the best part; it’s all factual.

Now, I know what you’re thinking. This is gunna be like some Nancy Drew or Hardy boys book. A little foreshadowing and you’ll have yourself a pretty good idea of what happened. Well forget that shit. The Somerset man is the Chinese finger trap of mysteries. Check it:
  • Mysterious identity
  • Mysterious cause of death
  • Mysterious witnesses
  • Mysterious secret, seemingly unbreakable codes? WTF??
Same mystery, significantly less homoeroticism.

Universal law #27: Turns out that most things were more hardcore in the 1940’s. This is why hat-man wears a fedora. This mystery comes from the 1940’s so keep that in mind.

Awesomeness tip: This is a pretty long and (hopefully) engrossing article. You should probably only start reading it if you have more then 5 minutes to kill.